Medical Research News
There are no records to display that match the provided criteria.
Startup Act Introduced by Sens. Moran, Warner in 114th Congress
Bipartisan jobs bill would jumpstart economy through the creation and growth of new businesses
Jan 16 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Mark Warner (D-Va.), along with Chris Coons (D-Del.), Roy Blunt (R-Mo.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) today reintroduced Startup Act in the 114th Congress – the bipartisan jobs plan aimed at jumpstarting the economy through the creation and growth of new businesses.
The Startup Act – based on research and analysis by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation – modifies the tax code to encourage investment in new businesses, accelerates the commercialization of university research that can lead to new ventures, and seeks to improve the regulatory process. The legislation is also the only proposal that creates both Entrepreneur and STEM Visas for highly-educated and entrepreneurs here legally to stay in the United States where their talent and new ideas can fuel economic growth and create American jobs.
“Startup Act is about creating jobs for Americans through the creation and growth of new businesses,” Sen. Moran said. “Entrepreneurs and the businesses they create are responsible for almost every net new job in America, but under our country’s current policies, new business formation and the rate of entrepreneurship among young people have reached historic lows. We must reverse these trends. Startup Act would reduce barriers to growth, encourage investment in new businesses, stem government overregulation, and accelerate the commercialization of university research that can lead to new ventures. Startup Act would also help make certain America remains the land of opportunity for innovators and entrepreneurs from around the globe. Under new leadership in the 114th Congress, I am hopeful Startup Act will no longer denied a vote.”
“In the new Congress, we are focused on continued growth in the economy, and we’re looking for ways to ensure that the United States is able to compete and win the global competition for talented innovators and entrepreneurs,” Sen. Warner said. “Our bipartisan legislation provides commonsense tools and greater support for the creation of more high-wage, high-skill jobs in Virginia and across the country.”
“Innovation is the fuel that powers our nation's economy,” Sen. Coons said. “Congress should constantly be looking for ways to help America's innovative startups grow and create jobs, and this bill contains more than half a dozen of them. The bipartisan Startup Act is proof that there are good ideas for economic growth that have support from both parties and deserve to be debated and considered on the floor.”
“Now more than ever, we cannot afford to lose American innovators and entrepreneurs as a result of anti-competitive domestic policies,” Sen. Blunt said. “But countries like Great Britain and Canada are already promoting their low-tax, business friendly regulatory environments in hopes of attracting U.S.-based companies to relocate. I’m pleased to join Senator Moran and my colleagues in reintroducing this common-sense bipartisan bill, and I’m hopeful that we can work together to encourage American entrepreneurship and help put more people back to work.”
“First-generation Americans have always found a home for their ideas and entrepreneurial spirit in America. That’s why I’m pleased to once again co-sponsor the Startup Act,” Sen. Kaine said. “By providing entrepreneurs and foreign students who are educated in American universities with the ability to pursue career opportunities here, the Startup Act will help grow Virginia’s diverse talent pool, fill STEM vacancies in American companies, and create employment opportunities in new business ventures for American workers.”
“Ninety of the Fortune 500 companies were founded by immigrants and more than 200 were founded by immigrants or their children,” Sen. Klobuchar said. “This bipartisan bill would help ensure the next generation of innovators and entrepreneurs can get their start in America and contribute their innovations to our country and economy.”
Research shows that for close to three decades, companies less than five years old have created almost all net new jobs in America – averaging about three million jobs each year.
Additionally, foreign-born entrepreneurs have a long history of creating businesses in America. Of the current Fortune 500 companies – including Apple, Google and eBay – more than 40 percent were founded by a first- or second-generation American. These American companies employ more than 10 million people. Both American and foreign-born entrepreneurs are needed to jumpstart the economy through the creation and growth of new businesses.
“In order for America to maintain its position as the most innovative and entrepreneurial nation, we must win the global battle for talent, increase access to capital for startups, and create pathways for fledgling startups to become iconic American businesses,” said Steve Case, Revolution LLC CEO and former member of President Obama’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. “The Startup Act encourages that by creating a visa for promising immigrant entrepreneurs and reforming the tax code to incentivize investments in startups and R&D. I’m pleased to see Senators Moran, Warner, Coons and Blunt kick off the year with a bipartisan focus on the essential need to keep our economy moving forward, and I am optimistic that Congress will pass this critical legislation.”
Many of the principles included in Startup Act are based on the research and analysis by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, and have been endorsed by President Obama’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness.
“Kauffman research has found that skilled immigrants are more likely than the native-born to start new businesses that hire Americans,” said Dane Stangler, vice president of Research and Policy, Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation. “The decline in business creation in the United States has coincided with reductions in the immigrant share of entrepreneurship and especially tech-based companies. Research suggests that growth and job creation and innovation would receive a significant boost from expanding immigrant entrepreneurship.”
“American startups are responsible for strengthening our economy, driving significant job growth and bringing innovative new products to market,” said Gary Shapiro, President and CEO of Consumer Electronics Association. “Congress needs to make sure that high-skilled labor shortages and outdated regulations don’t hold back this essential sector. The Startup Act is just what we need to foster innovation and support entrepreneurialism. This bill will create new visas to allow immigrants who earn STEM degrees in the U.S. to stay here and found companies, or use their talents at American businesses and create domestic jobs. It will also improve startups’ access to capital, and reduce burdensome and unnecessary rules that inhibit investment.”
The provisions in Startup Act have been endorsed by CEA, CTIA, Engine Advocacy, Computer and Communications Industry Association, the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, ITI, Northern Virginia Technology Council, and Tampa Bay Technology Forum.
“The Austin Tech Council represents one of the most innovative and accomplished technology communities in the world. The Startup Act is critical for funding and staffing the sustained success of our entrepreneurs and the national and regional Innovation Economies,” said Julie Huls, President and CEO of the Austin Technology Council. “We look forward to supporting Sen. Moran’s work to set this new benchmark in support of US competitors in the global market.”
Startup Act is also supported by additional regional groups including: Technology Councils of North America (TECNA), Arizona Technology Council (AZTC), Austin Technology Council (ATC), Chesapeake Regional Tech Council (CRTC), Colorado Technology Association (CTA), Connect (San Diego), Connecticut Technology Council (CTC), Howard Tech Council, Idaho Tech Council (ITC), Illinois Technology Association (ITA), KCnext - The Technology Council of Greater Kansas City, Massachusetts Technology Leadership Council (MassTLC), Metroplex Technology Business Council (MTBC), Minnesota High Tech Association (MHTA), Nashville Technology Council (NTC), New Hampshire High Tech Council (NHHTC), New Jersey Tech Council (NJTC), New York Technology Council (NYTECH), North Carolina Technology Association (NCTA), Northeast Ohio Software Association (NEOSA), OC TechAlliance, Tampa Bay Technology Forum (TBTF), Tech Collective (Rhode Island), Technology Association of Georgia (TAG), Technology Association of Louisville Kentucky (TALK), Technology Association of Oregon (TAO), Utah Technology Council (UTC), Washington Technology Industry Association (WTIA) and Wisconsin Technology Council.
Click below to read a one-pager on Why Startup Act Matters.
Click here to visit the Startup Act website.
Startup Act includes the following provisions:
- Makes permanent the exemption of capital gains taxes on the sale of startup stock held for at least five years – so investors can provide financial stability at a critical juncture of firm growth;
- Creates a limited research and development tax credit for young startups less than five years old and with less than $5 million in annual receipts. This R&D credit is designed to allow startups to offset employee taxes – freeing up resources to help these young companies expand and create jobs;
- Uses existing federal R&D funding to support university initiatives designed to bring cutting-edge research to the marketplace more quickly where it can propel economic growth;
- Creates an Entrepreneur’s Visa so foreign-born entrepreneurs in the United States legally can remain here, launch businesses and create jobs;
- Creates a new STEM visa so U.S.-educated foreign students in the United States legally, who graduate with a master’s or Ph.D. in science, technology, engineering or mathematics, can receive a green card and stay in this country where their talent and ideas can fuel growth and create American jobs;
- Eliminates the per-country caps for employment-based visas – which hinder U.S. employers from recruiting the top-tier talent they need to grow;
- Requires all government agencies to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of all proposed “significant rules” with an economic impact of $100 million or more. This new requirement will help determine the efficacy of regulations and their potential impact on the formation and growth of new businesses; and
- Directs the U.S. Department of Commerce to assess state and local policies that aid in the development of new businesses. Through the publication of reports on new business formation and the entrepreneurial environment, lawmakers will be better equipped to encourage entrepreneurship with the most successful policies.
# # #
Sen. Moran Introduces Startup Act Job-Creation Plan in 114th Congress
Bipartisan jobs bill would jumpstart economy through the creation and growth of new businesses
Jan 16 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) led five of his Senate colleagues today in reintroducing Startup Act in the 114th Congress – the bipartisan jobs plan aimed at jumpstarting the economy through the creation and growth of new businesses. Startup Act – based on research and analysis by the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation out of Kansas City – modifies the tax code to encourage investment in new businesses, accelerates the commercialization of university research that can lead to new ventures, and seeks to improve the regulatory process. Research shows that for close to three decades, companies less than five years old have created almost all net new jobs in America – averaging about three million jobs each year.
“Startup Act is about creating jobs for Americans through the creation and growth of new businesses,” Sen. Moran said. “Entrepreneurs and the businesses they create are responsible for almost every net new job in America, but under our country’s current policies, new business formation and the rate of entrepreneurship among young people have reached historic lows. We must reverse these trends. Startup Act would reduce barriers to growth, encourage investment in new businesses, stem government overregulation, and accelerate the commercialization of university research that can lead to new ventures. Startup Act would also help make certain America remains the land of opportunity for innovators and entrepreneurs from around the globe. Under new leadership in the 114th Congress, I am hopeful Startup Act will no longer denied a vote.”
Startup Act also creates both Entrepreneur and STEM Visas for highly-educated foreign-born entrepreneurs who are in the United States legally so they can stay here and their talent and new ideas can fuel economic growth and create American jobs. Foreign-born entrepreneurs have a long history of creating businesses in America. Of the current Fortune 500 companies – including Apple, Google and eBay – more than 40 percent were founded by a first- or second-generation American. These American companies employ more than 10 million people. Both American and foreign-born entrepreneurs are needed to jumpstart the economy through the creation and growth of new businesses.
“In order for America to maintain its position as the most innovative and entrepreneurial nation, we must win the global battle for talent, increase access to capital for startups, and create pathways for fledgling startups to become iconic American businesses,” said Steve Case, Revolution LLC CEO and former member of the President’s Council on Jobs and Competitiveness. “The Startup Act encourages that by creating a visa for promising immigrant entrepreneurs and reforming the tax code to incentivize investments in startups and R&D.
The provisions in Startup Act have been endorsed by CEA, CTIA, Engine Advocacy, Computer and Communications Industry Association, the Greater Kansas City Chamber of Commerce, The Technology Council of Greater Kansas City, ITI and Information Technology Industry Council. Additionally, Startup Act is also supported by Technology Councils of North America (TECNA) and more than 25 regional technology groups.
Click here to read a one-pager on Why Startup Act Matters.
Click here to visit the Startup Act website.
Startup Act includes the following provisions:
- Makes permanent the exemption of capital gains taxes on the sale of startup stock held for at least five years – so investors can provide financial stability at a critical juncture of firm growth;
- Creates a limited research and development tax credit for young startups less than five years old and with less than $5 million in annual receipts. This R&D credit is designed to allow startups to offset employee taxes – freeing up resources to help these young companies expand and create jobs;
- Uses existing federal R&D funding to support university initiatives designed to bring cutting-edge research to the marketplace more quickly where it can propel economic growth;
- Creates an Entrepreneur’s Visa so foreign-born entrepreneurs in the United States legally can remain here, launch businesses and create jobs;
- Creates a new STEM visa so U.S.-educated foreign students in the United States legally, who graduate with a master’s or Ph.D. in science, technology, engineering or mathematics, can receive a green card and stay in this country where their talent and ideas can fuel growth and create American jobs;
- Eliminates the per-country caps for employment-based visas – which hinder U.S. employers from recruiting the top-tier talent they need to grow;
- Requires all government agencies to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of all proposed “significant rules” with an economic impact of $100 million or more. This new requirement will help determine the efficacy of regulations and their potential impact on the formation and growth of new businesses; and
- Directs the U.S. Department of Commerce to assess state and local policies that aid in the development of new businesses. Through the publication of reports on new business formation and the entrepreneurial environment, lawmakers will be better equipped to encourage entrepreneurship with the most successful policies.
# # #
Sen. Moran Statement on Treasury Department Amendments to Cuban Assets Control Regulations
Jan 15 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) released the following statement regarding his support for the U.S. Treasury Department’s move to ease sanctions related to travel, remittances, trade and banking with Cuba:
“I am pleased to learn that the Treasury Department is following through on the decision to roll back antiquated polices related to U.S.-Cuba relations. Amending these regulations is not just about increasing commercial ties for agriculture producers in Kansas and across the country – I believe closer ties could help change the nature of the relationship between the Cuban people and their repressive government. Allowing U.S. citizens to travel to Cuba would further promote freedom and liberty by exposing Cubans to democratic thought and free market principles. And increasing the standard of living among Cuban citizens will enable them to make greater demands on their own government to increase individual and political rights.”
Sen. Moran has long fought for commonsense changes to U.S. trade policy with Cuba – which must import the vast majority of its food – in order to open up more markets for American farmers. On July 20, 2000, an amendment (H.Amdt.1031 to H.R.4871) offered by then Rep. Moran prohibiting funds being used to enforce sanctions for food, medicine and agriculture products in a sale to Cuba passed the House of Representatives (301-116) The adoption of this amendment opened another needed market to farmers throughout the country. Unfortunately, changes in regulations by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2005 once again severely restricted this market for U.S. agriculture producers. Since that time, Sen. Moran has introduced a number of amendments and consistently urged the Treasury Department to roll back the harmful regulations to enable farmers and ranchers to compete on a level playing field with foreign competitors when trading with Cuba.
Nearly 150 U.S. organizations have voiced their strong support for these commonsense reforms, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Association of Wheat Growers and the National Farmers Union.
###
Sen. Moran Sponsors Reintroduction of Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act
Legislation would improve mental health care and suicide prevention resources
Jan 13 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), a member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, today joined U.S. Senators John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) in introducing the bipartisan Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act. The legislation would provide critical measures to improve mental health care and suicide prevention resources for American service members. The bill, which passed the House of Representatives yesterday, will now proceed to the Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs for consideration.
"The Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act would be instrumental in developing a VA system capable of offering first-rate mental health care services, as well as utilizing the expertise of outside organizations to provide support for those struggling with the invisible wounds of war," Sen. Moran said. "It is critical that the VA follow through on its commitment to our nation’s veterans – especially so families who have lost loved ones may take comfort in knowing the VA is committed to suicide prevention. I will keep working to find solutions and to hold the VA accountable when it comes to providing our nation’s veterans with the timely, high-quality and specialized care they earned."
The Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act would require third-party evaluation of existing suicide prevention programs at the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to gauge their effectiveness and make recommendations for consolidation, elimination or improvement. It would also provide for a new website that offers veterans information regarding available mental healthcare services; create a pilot loan repayment program for VA psychiatrists; and improve the exchange of training, best practices, and other resources among the VA, Veteran Service Organizations (VSO), and nonprofit mental health organizations to enhance collaboration of suicide prevention efforts.
The bill was named for Clay Hunt, a Marine veteran who committed suicide in March 2011 at the age of 28. Clay enlisted in the Marine Corps in May 2005 and deployed to Anbar Province, near Fallujah, in January 2007. He was shot in the wrist by a sniper’s bullet that barely missed his head, earning him a Purple Heart. Clay recuperated at Twenty Nine Palms, Calif., and then graduated from Marine Corps Scout Sniper School in March 2008. He redeployed to southern Afghanistan a few weeks later. His unit returned in late October 2008 and he was honorably discharged from the Marines in April 2009. After returning home, Clay suffered from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for many years and struggled with inadequate care at his local VA hospital before taking his own life.
The legislation is supported by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America.
During a Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing on Nov. 19, 2014, Sen. Moran pressed the VA on the importance of supporting veterans struggling with mental health issues. Sen. Moran was moved to hear from Clay’s mom, Susan Selke, who testified before the committee. Susan shared her son’s story of reliving the traumatic experiences of war and his disappointment when the VA failed to offer the care he needed to treat his despair. To address the lack of mental health care professionals in the VA and improve suicide prevention over the last decade, Sen. Moran has asked the VA to utilize Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) to address the shortfall. The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, passed by Congress and signed into law in August, provides that a veteran can receive care from the doctor or provider of their choice if they live more than 40 miles from a VA medical center or Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC.) Sen. Moran raised concerns that many times a veteran will live near a VA facility, but that facility will not offer the mental health services they need.
YOUTUBE LINK: Click here to watch Sen. Moran’s remarks on YouTube.
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and David Perdue (R-Ga.) today introduced legislation to overhaul and simplify the American tax system. The bill, based upon a proposed tax system known as the "FairTax", would replace our complicated and costly tax system with a flat national consumption tax and eventually close the Internal Revenue Service.
"Overhauling the American tax system is not an easy undertaking, but the economic need for a leaner and fairer tax code has never been greater," Sen. Moran said. "Reducing costly inefficiencies and the burden of filing taxes should be a priority in this Congress. The FairTax would place all taxpayers on equal footing, protect Americans from government intrusion by the IRS, boost business growth, and incentivize savings and investment – all while collecting revenue at levels similar to those of our current mess of a tax code."
"In order for America’s economy to thrive in today’s international economy, we must remain competitive,” said Sen. Perdue. “Instituting the FairTax will level the playing field and make America the best place in the world to do business. The FairTax is smart policy that will help protect hardworking Georgians and all American taxpayers."
The FairTax would repeal all federal personal income taxes, corporate income taxes, payroll taxes, self-employment taxes, capital gains taxes and gift and estate taxes, and replace those with a revenue-neutral, personal consumption tax on all retail sales of new goods and services. U.S. Representative Rob Woodall (R-Ga.) has introduced the companion bill, H.R. 25, in the House of Representatives.
"The FairTax Act deserves to be heard in a committee setting, debated, and given an up or down vote," Sen. Moran continued. "This tax reform proposal would have a positive impact on millions of taxpayers, allowing Americans to once again be in charge of their lives and money."
"Americans For Fair Taxation® is thrilled that Senators Jerry Moran and David Perdue are leading the fight for real tax reform," said Steve Hayes, Chairman and President, Americans For Fair Taxation. "The Senators' sponsorship of the FairTax® serves notice that it is time for Congress to stand with the American people and enact the only tax replacement plan that will generate jobs, stimulate the economy and free the American people from the shackles of a punitive and out-of-control IRS."
Click below to read the legislative text of the FairTax Act.
# # #
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) announced today that he will serve as Chairman of the Senate Commerce Subcommittee for Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance and Data Security for 114th Congress.
“The rapid growth of e-commerce, electronic data storage, and international trade has increased the need for Congressional oversight of agencies responsible for safeguarding consumers from harm and deceptive practices,” Sen. Moran said. “I look forward to taking on the subcommittee’s expanded jurisdiction related to Data Security. As more sensitive consumer and proprietary data are stored electronically, the risk and costs of insecure data also increase. Congress and American businesses need to be vigilant about this real threat, so the tools that make life more convenient and efficient do not put consumers at undue risk. As Chairman, I plan to put the subcommittee to work quickly.”
Sen. Moran joined the Senate Commerce Committee in 2015. The Subcommittee on Consumer Protection, Product Safety, Insurance, and Data Security oversees the consumer protection efforts of the following federal agencies: the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, the National Highway Traffic Safety, and the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. The Subcommittee also has jurisdiction over property and casualty insurance and sports.
Sen. Moran Praises Final NBAF Funding Included in New House FY 2015 Homeland Security Appropriations Bill
Jan 09 2015
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), a member of the U.S. Senate Appropriations Committee, has announced that the Fiscal Year 2015 Homeland Security Appropriations Bill released today by the House Appropriations Committee includes $300 million for construction of the National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility (NBAF). This amount is equal to the funding passed by the Senate Appropriations Committee last year and builds on the $404 million appropriated for the construction of NBAF in the FY2014 Omnibus Appropriations Bill. The final passage of this funding will be a critical step forward for the construction of the main NBAF facility in Manhattan, Kan.
“As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, I am committed to making certain NBAF remains a top priority,” Sen. Moran said. “This $300 million investment mirrors the funding passed out of the Senate Appropriations Committee last year and solidifies Washington’s support for the construction of a modern, world-class facility in Manhattan, Kansas, which will protect Americans against biological threats. I am hopeful this final funding will soon be passed by both Houses of Congress and ultimately help create jobs for Kansans in the fields of engineering, science and technology. The talented young men and women who grow up here will have more opportunities to work and live in Kansas, which is poised to become a research epicenter.”
Passage of the FY2015 Homeland Security Appropriations Bill was stalled at the end of 2014 with President Obama’s announcement of an Executive Order granting amnesty to millions of individuals who have entered the country illegally. As a result, Congress passed a Continuing Resolution funding the Department of Homeland Security at FY2014 levels through February 27, 2015. The House Appropriations Committee Fiscal Year 2015 Homeland Security Appropriations Bill released today must pass the U.S. House of Representatives and would then be considered by the U.S. Senate to fund the remainder of FY2015..
NBAF, a state-of-the-art biosecurity lab, is to be built adjacent to Kansas State University. A January 2012 economic impact report found the NBAF will employ approximately 326 permanent employees and support some 757 construction jobs. The state of Kansas showed its commitment to this project by contributing $202 million. The facility is expected to have a $3.5 billion economic impact on Kansas in the first 20 years alone.
In addition to creating an economic boom for Kansas, NBAF will protect our national economy by researching foreign animal disease threats, which are very real with devastating impacts. The cost of an outbreak far outweighs the NBAF construction cost, not only in the loss of human life but also its damage to the animal and agricultural industry.
The main laboratory will boast safety and security features recommended by the National Academies of Sciences. It will include specialized air and water decontamination systems, new technologies for handling solid waste onsite, and structural components to strengthen the laboratory against hazardous weather conditions. A funding commitment was also made to provide infrastructure repairs at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center to guarantee a smooth transition of research
The main laboratory will boast safety and security features recommended by the National Academies of Sciences. It will include specialized air and water decontamination systems, new technologies for handling solid waste onsite, and structural components to strengthen the laboratory against hazardous weather conditions. A funding commitment was also made to provide infrastructure repairs at the Plum Island Animal Disease Center to guarantee a smooth transition of research from Plum Island, N.Y., to Manhattan, Kan.
###
MANHATTAN, KAN. – Today, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) released the following statement regarding his support for modifying U.S.-Cuba trade policy:
“I have long fought to change the unilateral U.S. sanctions and regulations that restrict the ability of our farmers and ranchers to sell their products to Cuba.
“Cuba is only 90 miles from our border, making it a natural market for U.S. agricultural commodities, including Kansas wheat. Cuba imports approximately 80 percent of the food they consume. Wheat is Cuba’s largest food commodity import and second-largest import overall, only behind oil. While the United States has unilaterally erected trade barriers that harm our own farmers, other countries are more than happy to fill this market. For example, this year Cuba has purchased $150 million worth of wheat from the European Union alone.
“It simply does not make sense to continue policies and regulations blocking U.S. farmers from this market only for it to be filled by our competitors. Industry experts believe that U.S. wheat could grow to 80-90 percent of the market share in Cuba if the trade restrictions are eased, similar to our market share in other Caribbean nations. Considering it costs an average of $20-25 per ton to ship grain from Europe to Cuba versus about $6-7 per ton from the United States, it makes economic sense for U.S. commodities to make up the lion’s share of the Cuban market.
“Wheat is especially important to me since Kansas leads the nation in wheat milling and production. However, many other U.S. and Kansas commodities would benefit from opening the Cuban market. A 2010 Texas A&M study estimates that easing restrictions and lifting the travel ban could result in $365 million in additional sales of U.S. agricultural commodities, boost the U.S. economy by $1.1 billion, and create 6000 new jobs.
“Beyond providing a new market for U.S. farmers, easing restrictions on trade and travel with Cuba may bring about reforms in the repressive Cuban government – reforms that more than 50 years of the current policy have not achieved. Current U.S. policy only serves to limit American’s freedom to trade and travel with the island nation while contributing to the ongoing misery of the Cuban people. A change in our nation's approach that can open Cuba up economically and politically through the exchange of commodities and ideas is necessary.
“I have often said, in Kansas we will try anything once – sometimes twice or even three times. However, if we have been trying something for over five decades and it has yet to work, it is time to change direction. It is time to change our Cuba policies. It is time for U.S. farmers and ranchers to truly have market access to Cuba’s 11 million consumers.”
Background:
Sen. Moran has long fought for commonsense changes to U.S. trade policy with Cuba – which must import nearly 85 percent of its food – in order to open up more markets for American farmers. On July 20, 2000, an amendment (H.Amdt.1031 to H.R.4871) offered by then Rep. Moran prohibiting funds being used to enforce sanctions for food, medicine and agriculture products in a sale to Cuba passed the House of Representatives (301-116) The adoption of this amendment opened another needed market to farmers throughout the country. Unfortunately, changes in regulations by the U.S. Department of the Treasury in 2005 once again severely restricted this market.
In February 2010, then-Congressman Moran introduced – and the House Agriculture Committee passed – H.R. 4645, legislation to expand agricultural trade with Cuba
In Sept. 2011, Sen. Moran’s legislation to remove a trade barrier with Cuba by allowing direct cash payments from Cuban buyers to U.S. financial institutions during the 2012 fiscal year (FY), was adopted by the U.S. Senate Committee on Appropriations as an amendment to the FY2012 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Bill. By allowing direct cash payments, Sen. Moran’s amendment will fuel economic growth and enable agricultural producers to compete on a level playing field.
Nearly 150 U.S. organizations have voiced their strong support for doing so, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the American Farm Bureau Federation, the National Association of Wheat Growers and the National Farmers Union.
###
MANHATTAN, KAN. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) – a member of the Senate Appropriations Agriculture Subcommittee – today welcomed the news that U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack will not move forward with the creation of a new beef checkoff program under the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996. Last month, Sen. Moran sent a letter to Sec. Vilsack expressing his deep concern with USDA creating a new checkoff under the 1996 Act against the wishes of cattle producers.
“I am pleased that USDA will not move forward with the creation of a new beef checkoff,” Sen. Moran said. “Changes to the beef checkoff should be supported by producers, not forced upon them administratively by the federal government. I appreciate that Secretary Vilsack listened to the voices of cattle producers from across the country who clearly objected to a new checkoff.”
Last month, Sen. Moran called on Sec. Vilsack to listen to feedback from producers in Kansas and across the country who have real concerns about the creation of a new beef checkoff under the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996.
“Cattlemen have been loud and clear in their objections to a new beef checkoff,” Sen. Moran said when he sent his November letter to Sec. Vilsack. “I am deeply concerned that USDA is ignoring the voices of producers.”
See below the full text of the letter to Sec. Vilsack:
November 20, 2014
The Honorable Thomas J. Vilsack
Secretary of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
1400 Independence Ave., SW Room 200-A
Washington DC 20250
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Recently the U.S. Department of Agriculture requested public input on the development of a checkoff program that would operate parallel to the current Beef Checkoff Program. As you are aware, there are serious concerns within the beef industry with a checkoff established under the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996. I share those concerns and do not support this administrative, top-down approach from the federal government to develop a new, separate checkoff under the 1996 Act.
The current Beef Checkoff Program, created under the Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985, has proven to be successful in both the research and promotion of U.S. beef. A recent Cornell University study concluded between 2006 and 2013 there was an $11.20 return to the beef industry for each $1 invested in the checkoff. Given the high rate of return, it is not surprising a Beef Producer Attitude Survey conducted earlier this year found that a vast majority of beef producers across the country express overall support for the current checkoff and believe it is well managed.
Much of the success of the current Beef Checkoff Program is attributable to its structure. After rejecting two previous versions, producers supported the checkoff created under the 1985 Act partially due to the fact that it allows for significant grassroots involvement. In particular, the current checkoff involves state beef councils like the Kansas Beef Council. This crucial grassroots involvement is not assured under the 1996 Act. In addition, there is a good chance a new, separate checkoff created under the 1996 Act operating parallel to the current checkoff would add administrative expenses and red tape to the current successful system.
While it is easy to find substantial evidence of its success, I support the ongoing efforts by the beef industry to find ways to enhance the checkoff. The Beef Checkoff Enhancement Working Group, comprised of an array of general farm and livestock groups, has worked diligently to craft consensus reforms to enhance the checkoff. There is no doubt that $1 today has less buying power compared to 1985 when the Beef Checkoff Program was established. Yet, the decision on whether to increase the checkoff, or to make other modifications to the structure of the checkoff, should rest in the hands of the producers who fund the checkoff, not the federal government.
Using executive authority under the 1996 Act to placate a minority of cattle producers would run counter to its purpose and result in a less effective program. If you persist with this course of action, it will not be viewed favorably by Congress, which specifically created the 1985 Act to meet the needs of the beef industry and function as a producer operated program.
The current Beef Checkoff Program established under the 1985 Act is successful and popular. I understand your frustration with the progress made thus far by the Beef Checkoff Enhancement Working Group and the temptation to make rash decisions for the industry. However, I join beef producers and cattlemen across the country in insisting that you leave the decision to potentially modify the checkoff to the beef industry and not create a new beef checkoff under the 1996 Act.
Sincerely,
Jerry Moran
###
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, has introduced legislation (S.3006) directing the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to utilize its authority to offer community care to veterans who currently are unable to receive the healthcare services they need from a VA medical facility within 40 miles of where they live.
"The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 was passed with the intention of providing veterans with the choice to access health care outside the VA when timeliness and distance put their well-being at risk," Sen. Moran said. "Unfortunately, many rural Kansas veterans are still unable to access the care they need because common sense is not prevailing. It has become clear that the VA is implementing the Choice Act in a way that only takes into account distance to a VA medical facility, and not whether that facility can provide the medical services a veteran requires."
"For example, while the services offered at Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs) are invaluable, they cannot meet the health care needs of all veterans. Living near a CBOC should not prevent a veteran from accessing care which the CBOC cannot provide. The VA has the authority to fix this problem and have been calling on the VA Secretary to take action for several months," Sen. Moran continued. "Enough is enough. In the absence of VA action, I have introduced legislation that would make certain rural veterans are not forgotten just because of where they live."
In July, the House and Senate came together to pass the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (VACAA), comprehensive legislation to respond to VA wait-time manipulation and failure to provide timely, quality health care to veterans. This legislation permitted veterans across the country to access non-VA community care if they live more than 40 miles from a VA medical facility, including Community-Based Outpatient Clinics (CBOCs), or their wait time for an appointment is more than 30 days. Even with this new law, many rural Kansas veterans are still unable to access the care they require because their nearest VA facility does not offer the medical services they need.
The introduction of S. 3006 comes on the heels of several months of efforts by Sen. Moran to work with the VA on this issue. On September 9, 2014, Sen. Moran questioned VA Secretary Bob McDonald during a Senate Veterans Affairs’ Committee hearing on the VA’s interpretation of the 40 mile eligibility criteria of the Choice Act.
On November 14, 2014, Sen. Moran called on Sec. McDonald to meet in-person to discuss the VACAA and make certain the legislation is implemented and upheld the way it was intended and in the best interest of veterans. This includes offering non-VA care to veterans who are unable to receive the healthcare services they requite from a VA medical facility within 40 miles of where they live.
On December 11, 2014, Sen. Moran met with Deputy Secretary of the VA, Sloan Gibson, who reiterated the limitations of the Choice Act language and indicated the VA could not use its authorities under Title 38 to provide this access to non-VA care.
# # #