Medical Research News

There are no records to display that match the provided criteria.

Sen. Moran Sponsors Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act

Legislation would improve mental health care and suicide prevention resources

Dec 03 2014

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), a member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, today sponsored the bipartisan Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act. The legislation would provide critical measures to improve mental health care and suicide prevention resources for American service members.

“The Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act would be instrumental in developing a VA system capable of offering first-rate mental health care services, as well as utilizing the expertise of outside organizations to provide support for those struggling with the invisible wounds of war,” Sen. Moran said. “It is critical that the VA follow through on its commitment to our nation’s veterans – especially so families who have lost loved ones may take comfort in knowing the VA is committed to suicide prevention. I will keep working to find solutions and to hold the VA accountable when it comes to providing our nation’s veterans with the timely, high-quality and specialized care they earned.”

The Clay Hunt Suicide Prevention for American Veterans Act would require third-party evaluation of existing suicide prevention programs at the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to gauge their effectiveness and make recommendations for consolidation, elimination or improvement. It would also provide for a new website that offers veterans information regarding available mental healthcare services; create a pilot loan repayment program for VA psychiatrists; and improve the exchange of training, best practices, and other resources among the VA, Veteran Service Organizations (VSO), and nonprofit mental health organizations to enhance collaboration of suicide prevention efforts.

The bill was named for Clay Hunt, a Marine veteran who committed suicide in March 2011 at the age of 28. Clay enlisted in the Marine Corps in May 2005 and deployed to Anbar Province, near Fallujah, in January 2007. He was shot in the wrist by a sniper’s bullet that barely missed his head, earning him a Purple Heart. Clay recuperated at Twenty Nine Palms, Calif., and then graduated from Marine Corps Scout Sniper School in March 2008. He redeployed to southern Afghanistan a few weeks later. His unit returned in late October 2008 and he was honorably discharged from the Marines in April 2009. After returning home, Clay suffered from Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for many years and struggled with inadequate care at his local VA hospital before taking his own life.

The legislation is supported by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America. 

During a Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee hearing on Nov. 19, 2014, Sen. Moran pressed the VA on the importance of supporting veterans struggling with mental health issues. Sen. Moran was moved to hear from Clay’s mom, Susan Selke, who testified before the committee. Susan shared her son’s story of reliving the traumatic experiences of war and his disappointment when the VA failed to offer the care he needed to treat his despair. To address the lack of mental health care professionals in the VA and improve suicide prevention over the last decade, Sen. Moran has asked the VA to utilize Community Mental Health Centers (CMHC) to address the shortfall. The Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014, passed by Congress and signed into law in August, provides that a veteran can receive care from the doctor or provider of their choice if they live more than 40 miles from a VA medical center or Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC.) Sen. Moran raised concerns that many times a veteran will live near a VA facility, but that facility will not offer the mental health services they need. 

YOUTUBE LINK: Click here to watch Sen. Moran’s remarks on YouTube.

###

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) will serve as the next co-chair of the U.S. Senate Aerospace Caucus. The future of aerospace and aviation is especially important to the state of Kansas and the community of Wichita, known as the “Air Capital of the World.” Roughly 32,000 Kansans support more than 450 aerospace companies – from large companies like Airbus, Spirit AeroSystems, Bombardier and Textron, to hundreds of smaller suppliers – and their work contributes more than $7 billion annually to Kansas’ economy.

Sen. Moran joins U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-Wash.) as co-chair and replaces U.S. Senator Saxby Chambliss (R-Ga.) who has served as co-chair since 2011 and is retiring at the end of this Congress.

"Safeguarding our nation for future generations means both a strong national defense and a strong economy,” Sen. Moran said. “The aerospace industry is where these two priorities converge. That is why I am proud to be co-chairing the Senate Aerospace Caucus. Promoting education, workforce and research development, as well as increasing manufacturing within the aerospace industry is vital to our Kansas and national economies. I look forward to continuing my work to make certain this historical and innovative American industry remains strong, secure and competitive globally."

"When a Navy P8 pilot takes off from Whidbey Island, Washington, he is flying not only one of the most advanced maritime surveillance aircraft in the world, but also a product of both Wichita, Kansas, and Renton, Washington,” Sen. Murray said. “When an Air Force KC-46 pilot launches from McConnell Airbase in Wichita, she’s seated in a cockpit made in Kansas and assembled into a modern air to air refueling platform in Washington. I have always respected Senator Moran for his integrity and energy and I look forward to working with him to ensure that these kinds of productive collaborations can continue as we fight to ensure a strong and competitive American aerospace sector."

"I can think of no one more appropriate to take my place as co-chair of the Senate Aerospace Caucus than Senator Jerry Moran,” said Sen. Chambliss. “He is a strong and passionate advocate for the industry and, alongside Senator Murray, he will lead this caucus to even greater heights. The United States has the most robust aerospace and defense program in the world, and I know that Senator Moran will continue to serve as a great champion for this important industry."

"AIA welcomes Senator Jerry Moran’s selection to co-chair the Senate Aerospace Caucus,” said Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) President and CEO Marion C. Blakey. “Kansas is a major center for aerospace innovation, and we know Senator Moran will continue advocating for strong U.S. leadership in this field.  Our industry makes an important contribution to our nation’s economy and national security, and we look forward to working with Senator Moran to keep our nation second to none.”

Founded in 2010, the Senate Aerospace Caucus provides a forum for Senators and aerospace industry representatives to discuss issues of importance to the nation’s defense, civil aviation and space sectors. The aerospace caucus:

Provides critical oversight of the U.S. government’s aerospace defense industry program;

Promotes increased government investment in U.S. aviation infrastructure and development;

Ensures a competitive industrial base; and

Promotes education and workforce development programs that prepare Americans for careers in the aerospace industry.

Kansas serves as a crossroads for global aerospace. According to the Kansas Aviation Museum, Kansas aviation workers have supplied 74 percent of all general aviation aircraft since the Wright Brother’s first flight at Kitty Hawk. Today, roughly 32,000 Kansans support more than 450 aerospace companies – from large companies like Airbus, Spirit AeroSystems, Bombardier and Textron, to hundreds of smaller suppliers – and their work contributes more than $7 billion annually to our state’s economy. General aviation is Kansas’ largest industry and generates nearly $2.9 billion in exports each year.

# # #

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) today issued the following statement following news of an extension of P5+1 nuclear negotiations with Iran:

“Given the President’s worrisome admission that a year of diplomatic dialogue failed to bridge the ‘significant’ gaps between P5+1 negotiators and Iran, I am skeptical of what this extension can accomplish,” Sen. Moran said. “As negotiations carry on, Congress must continue to demand terms that secure lasting and verifiable dismantlement of Iran’s illicit nuclear program. Any sanctions relief must be dependent on evident compliance by Iran. The world has too much at stake to accept a dangerous deal that disregards the concerns of Congress and the American people.”

On Tuesday, Nov. 19, 2014, Sen. Moran and 42 Senate Republicans sent a letter to President Obama to explain the costs of striking a weak nuclear deal with Iran. The letter also urges the Obama administration to be steadfast on negotiating conditions previously outlined by Congress and the administration.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) – a member of the Senate Appropriations Agriculture Subcommittee – today called on U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Secretary Tom Vilsack to listen to feedback from producers in Kansas and across the country who have real concerns about the creation of a new beef checkoff under the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996.

 

“Cattlemen have been loud and clear in their objections to a new beef checkoff,” Sen. Moran said. “I am deeply concerned that USDA is ignoring the voices of producers. I believe changes to the checkoff should be supported by producers, and not forced upon them by the federal government.”

 

See below the full text of the letter to Sec. Vilsack:

 

November 20, 2014

 

The Honorable Thomas J. Vilsack

Secretary of Agriculture

United States Department of Agriculture

1400 Independence Ave., SW Room 200-A

Washington DC 20250

 

Dear Mr. Secretary:

 

Recently the U.S. Department of Agriculture requested public input on the development of a checkoff program that would operate parallel to the current Beef Checkoff Program. As you are aware, there are serious concerns within the beef industry with a checkoff established under the Commodity Promotion, Research and Information Act of 1996. I share those concerns and do not support this administrative, top-down approach from the federal government to develop a new, separate checkoff under the 1996 Act.

 

The current Beef Checkoff Program, created under the Beef Promotion and Research Act of 1985, has proven to be successful in both the research and promotion of U.S. beef. A recent Cornell University study concluded between 2006 and 2013 there was an $11.20 return to the beef industry for each $1 invested in the checkoff. Given the high rate of return, it is not surprising a Beef Producer Attitude Survey conducted earlier this year found that a vast majority of beef producers across the country express overall support for the current checkoff and believe it is well managed.

 

Much of the success of the current Beef Checkoff Program is attributable to its structure. After rejecting two previous versions, producers supported the checkoff created under the 1985 Act partially due to the fact that it allows for significant grassroots involvement. In particular, the current checkoff involves state beef councils like the Kansas Beef Council. This crucial grassroots involvement is not assured under the 1996 Act. In addition, there is a good chance a new, separate checkoff created under the 1996 Act operating parallel to the current checkoff would add administrative expenses and red tape to the current successful system.

 

While it is easy to find substantial evidence of its success, I support the ongoing efforts by the beef industry to find ways to enhance the checkoff. The Beef Checkoff Enhancement Working Group, comprised of an array of general farm and livestock groups, has worked diligently to craft consensus reforms to enhance the checkoff. There is no doubt that $1 today has less buying power compared to 1985 when the Beef Checkoff Program was established. Yet, the decision on whether to increase the checkoff, or to make other modifications to the structure of the checkoff, should rest in the hands of the producers who fund the checkoff, not the federal government.

 

Using executive authority under the 1996 Act to placate a minority of cattle producers would run counter to its purpose and result in a less effective program. If you persist with this course of action, it will not be viewed favorably by Congress, which specifically created the 1985 Act to meet the needs of the beef industry and function as a producer operated program.

 

The current Beef Checkoff Program established under the 1985 Act is successful and popular. I understand your frustration with the progress made thus far by the Beef Checkoff Enhancement Working Group and the temptation to make rash decisions for the industry. However, I join beef producers and cattlemen across the country in insisting that you leave the decision to potentially modify the checkoff to the beef industry and not create a new beef checkoff under the 1996 Act.

 

Sincerely,

 

Jerry Moran

 

###

This week, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) honored Ross and Marianna Kistler Beach on the U.S. Senate Floor. Marianna recently passed away, and her late-husband Ross Beach – who passed away in 2010 – were residents of Hays, Kan., for more than 60 years before moving to Lawrence, Kan., in 2000. The devoted couple was well-known and well-loved for their acts of service and kindness to others. Because of Marianna and Ross Beach, numerous Kansans have been inspired through the arts, and individuals with disabilities and their families have lived healthier, more productive lives.

U.S. Senate Passes Sen. Moran's Resolution on Importance of Rural Health Care

Access to quality care essential to survival and success of Kansas communities

Nov 21 2014

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Last night, the U.S. Senate passed S. Res. 588 – a resolution introduced by U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) – to recognize the importance of hospitals and other health care providers to the survival and success of communities in Kansas and throughout the country.  Sen. Moran introduced the original version of this bipartisan Senate resolution (S. Res. 26) in February 2013, and he introduced the updated version earlier this week to pass the Senate in commemoration of National Rural Health Day, which was celebrated yesterday.

“When visiting towns across Kansas, I am reminded of what I loved about growing up in rural America – the strong sense of community,” Sen. Moran said. “Our special way of life in these towns would not be possible without the quality health care that our rural doctors, nurses, support staff, and administrators provide. Additionally, rural health care providers are a vital part of the local economy of a community. I am pleased that last night the Senate formally recognized the importance of rural health care.”

###

The U.S. Senate has passed H.R. 4067 to delay Medicare’s enforcement of unreasonable and inflexible direct supervision rules for outpatient therapy services at all hospitals including Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs). U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) introduced the original version of this bill, S. 1954, and it passed the Senate on Feb. 10, 2014. Congresswoman Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.) introduced an identical version of the bill in the U.S. House of Representatives and it passed the House on Sept. 9, 2014.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) today issued the following statement on President Obama’s plan to issue an executive order on immigration:

“I am deeply concerned about the President offering amnesty to millions of individuals who have entered the country illegally. The President is aware that he is overstepping his bounds – and has explained at least 22 times that he does not have the authority to unilaterally alter immigration laws. I oppose President Obama’s plan to act alone on an issue of such importance. The President is choosing to allow 5 million people to jump the line in front of those who have followed the rules and are waiting to come to our country legally. This irresponsible decision encourages and incentivizes illegal activity – it will increase the number of people illegally entering the United States, while making it more difficult for Congress to address the problems of our immigration system.

“President Obama declared his policies were under referendum on Election Day. He was correct, and on November 4, the American people voted to take our country in a different direction.”

###

On Wednesday, November 19, 2014, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran paid tribute to outgoing Kansas Farm Bureau President Steve Baccus. Kansas Farm Bureau is Kansas' largest general farm organization, with nearly 105,000 members. Under his leadership, the organization has influenced policy and politics, promoted rural values and worked to show an increasingly urban populace how food is produced and why technology is indispensable to feeding a hungry planet.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – This week, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), member of the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee, and a group of senators also on the committee called on Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Secretary Bob McDonald to meet in-person to discuss the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (VACAA) and make certain it is implemented and upheld the way it was intended and in the best interest of veterans. This includes offering non-VA care to veterans who are unable to receive healthcare services from a VA medical facility within 40 miles of where a veteran resides.

“We understood that it is your desire to carry out VACAA as it was intended and in the best interest of the veteran,” the senators wrote to Sec. McDonald. “Regrettably, the VA’s interpretation of the 40-mile eligibility criteria is inconsistent with your message and guidance.  Due to numerous discussions on this issue, the VA has agreed to a review utilizing existing authorities to identify the types of non-VA healthcare services that may be offered to a veteran when the same services are not available at a VA facility within 40 miles.  We are concerned that this narrow review will fail to guard against subjective determinations by bureaucrats of which medical services warrant an exception to the 40-mile rule and which do not.”

On Sept. 9, 2014, during a Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee Hearing, Sen. Moran asked VA Sec. McDonald to clarify how the VA was going to handle care for rural veterans. Sen. Moran received a commitment from Sec. McDonald that the VA will make certain veterans receive the care they need through VACAA and will not experience the burden of travel to access that care, particularly if a VA facility within 40 miles of where a veteran resides does not offer the care and treatment the veteran is seeking. Click here to view the exchange.

See below the full text of the letter to Sec. McDonald:

November 14, 2014

The Honorable Robert A. McDonald
Secretary of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, DC  20420

Dear Secretary McDonald:

We write to urge the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) to comply with the intent of the Veterans Access, Choice, and Accountability Act of 2014 (VACAA) by offering non-VA care to veterans who are unable to receive healthcare services from a VA medical facility within 40 miles.  The VA should either implement the law as intended under VACAA or pursue existing authorities under Title 38 to provide access to quality healthcare that veterans deserve.  

In response to VA wait time manipulation and failure to provide timely, quality healthcare to veterans, Congress passed VACAA with the expressed purpose of improving transparency at the VA and providing veterans the choice to access healthcare outside the VA healthcare system when timeliness and distance put their well-being at risk.  Unfortunately, the VA’s decision to exclude veterans who live within 40 miles of a VA facility, but who may be in need of a service or treatment not available at that facility, from the 40-mile eligibility criteria limits veterans’ choice and runs counter to Congressional intent.  It was Congress’s intent that if veterans cannot receive VA care within 40 miles of their home, they be permitted to receive non-VA care within the local community.

Based on your testimony before the Senate Veterans’ Affairs Committee in September, we understood that it is your desire to carry out VACAA as it was intended and in the best interest of the veteran.  Regrettably, the VA’s interpretation of the 40-mile eligibility criteria is inconsistent with your message and guidance.  Due to numerous discussions on this issue, the VA has agreed to a review utilizing existing authorities to identify the types of non-VA healthcare services that may be offered to a veteran when the same services are not available at a VA facility within 40 miles.  We are concerned that this narrow review will fail to guard against subjective determinations by bureaucrats of which medical services warrant an exception to the 40-mile rule and which do not.  For example, a service that may seem insignificant to a VA staff member who determines a three hour drive is acceptable in order to receive that care, may be quite impactful to the health and well-being of veterans.  If a VA facility simply cannot offer healthcare services veterans are requesting, regardless of the size and capability of that facility, the VA can and should provide veterans the choice of utilizing non-VA care closer to home.

While we would prefer that the VA adjust its interpretation of the 40-mile eligibility criteria, an effective use of existing authorities would be to allow VA Medical Center (VAMC) Directors to exercise their discretion in the use of fee-basis care if it is determined the veteran would be unduly burdened by excessive travel.  We urge you to direct VAMC Directors to exercise their discretion in authorizing non-VA care for veterans who reside more than 40 miles from a VA facility that provides the health care services the veteran requires.

Based on the commencement of the Choice Card deliveries to veterans, we request an opportunity to meet with you and discuss this issue in-person.  We strongly encourage you to adjust VA’s interpretation of the 40-mile eligibility criteria or utilize existing authorities to coincide with Congressional intent as stated in the VACAA Conference Report.  Our veterans deserve nothing less.  We look forward to your timely response, and thank you for your commitment to our nation’s veterans.             

Sincerely,

Jerry Moran
Mike Johanns
Johnny Isakson
John Boozman

###