Medical Research News
There are no records to display that match the provided criteria.
WASHINGTON – The Senate Finance Committee today passed the bipartisan Startup Innovation Credit to allow startups to claim the popular Research and Development tax credit. The Finance Committee amendment, which aims to help jumpstart the economy by creating and growing new businesses and jobs, passed the Committee as part of a tax extenders legislative package. The Startup Innovation Credit is based on language included in the Startup Act 3.0, bipartisan legislation which was introduced by U.S. Sens. Jerry Moran (R-KS) and Mark R. Warner (D-VA).
"I am very pleased to see the Senate Finance Committee approved a tax extenders package that includes Startup Act’s R&D tax credit for startup companies. Research shows that companies five years or younger create all net new jobs in the American economy,” Sen. Moran said. “We also know the recession had a major impact on the economy, dropping new business formation to a historically low level. Most startups do not earn a profit immediately after they launch, and therefore are limited from accessing R&D tax credits available to larger, profitable businesses. The proposal adopted by the Finance Committee offers startup companies that are not yet profitable a tool to expand without facing a greater tax liability, increasing the chances they can ultimately grow and hire more Americans. This credit is a central part of the bipartisan Startup Act 3.0, the leading pro-entrepreneur legislation in the U.S. Senate."
To qualify for the Startup Innovation Credit, a company must be less than five years old and have less than $5 million in gross receipts. The benefit is capped at $250,000 per year. Since many young companies invest heavily in research and development in their first few years but don’t yet have income tax liability, they are unable to claim federal income tax credits, including the R&D Tax Credit. In fact, according to a Government Accountability Office report, more than half of the credit claimed by companies each year goes to firms with $1 billion or more in receipts.
“Startups create about three million new jobs each year, but they face immense challenges getting their businesses off the ground,” Sen. Warner said. “I’m pleased that because of our bipartisan amendment, more startups may be able to access the immensely popular R&D tax credit. This will help make sure more startups in Virginia can spend more resources on creating jobs. I look forward to passing this legislation out of the full Senate, and I will continue working with Senator Moran and our cosponsors to pass Startup 3.0 as well.
Startup Act 3.0 is co-sponsored by Sens. Roy Blunt (R-MS), Chris Coons (D-DE), Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Tim Kaine (D-VA) and Marco Rubio (R-FL). It is based upon research showing that for close to three decades, companies less than five years old have created almost all of the net new jobs in America.
The Startup Innovation Credit was cosponsored by Sens. Warner, Pat Roberts (R-KS), Debbie Stabenow (D-MI), Maria Cantwell (D-WA), Chuck Schumer (D-NY) and Mike Enzi (R-WY).
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) joined U.S. Senators John Thune (R-S.D.) and Senator Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) in seeking clarification from Assistant Secretary of Commerce Larry Strickling, head of the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), regarding the recent announcement that NTIA intends to relinquish responsibility of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions to the global multistakeholder community. The IANA is responsible for the global coordination of the domain name system, assigning IP addresses, and other internet protocol resources.
"The internet has changed with world, brought democratic ideals to the masses, and become a driving force in American innovation, technology and entrepreneurship,” Sen. Moran said. “I will work to protect the internet from government intervention, and oppose any attempt by this Administration to allow control by governments and international organizations that do not share our values of freedom of speech and thought."
The letter expresses Sen. Moran’s strong support for “the existing bottom-up, multistakeholder approach to the internet governance that has led to immense prosperity and empowerment for individuals around the world. The current approach has helped to define the open internet, which has allowed the private sector to deliver technology and services that have changed our lives for the better,” and cautions: “We must not allow the IANA functions to fall under the control of repressive governments, America’s enemies, or unaccountable bureaucrats."
The letter goes on to say: “The global community of Internet stakeholders should act deliberately and transparently as it formulates a possible proposal to transition the IANA functions to a nongovernmental entity. The multistakeholder model of Internet governance and the IANA functions are far too important for this process to be rushed or to be done behind closed doors."
Among other things, the letter asks the administration to “explain why it is in our national interest to transition the IANA functions,” and how NTIA will ensure “the IANA functions do not end up being controlled, directly or indirectly, by a government or inter-governmental entity."
The text of the members’ letter is below:
__
The Honorable Lawrence Strickling
Assistant Secretary for Communications and Information
National Telecommunications and Information Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce
1401 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC 20230
Dear Assistant Secretary Strickling:
We write concerning the recent announcement by the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) that it intends to relinquish responsibility of the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) functions to the global multistakeholder community. In its announcement, NTIA also asked the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) to convene stakeholders and develop a proposal to transition the role currently played by NTIA.
We strongly support the existing bottom-up, multistakeholder approach to Internet governance that has led to immense prosperity and empowerment for individuals around the world. The current approach has helped to define the open Internet, which has allowed the private sector to deliver technology and services that have changed our lives for the better. In 2012, many of us were leaders on S. Con. Res. 50, a resolution that reinforced the U.S. government’s opposition to ceding control of the Internet to the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), an arm of the United Nations, or to any other governmental body. As you know, S. Con. Res. 50 unanimously passed both the Senate and the House of Representatives, a rare instance of bipartisan agreement on such an important topic.
In announcing the intended transition, NTIA committed that it “will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a government-led or an inter-governmental organization solution.” We agree that any such proposal would be completely unacceptable. Replacing NTIA’s role with another governmental organization would be disastrous, and we would vigorously oppose such a plan. We must not allow the IANA functions to fall under the control of repressive governments, America’s enemies, or unaccountable bureaucrats.
The global community of Internet stakeholders should act deliberately and transparently as it formulates a possible proposal to transition the IANA functions to a nongovernmental entity. The multistakeholder model of Internet governance and the IANA functions are far too important for this process to be rushed or to be done behind closed doors.
Because this issue is so important to the future of the Internet and for the protection of American values and interests, we request expeditious responses to the following questions and requests for information about the proposed IANA transition.
- A 2000 report by the U.S. General Accounting Office stated that “it is unclear if the Department [of Commerce] has the requisite authority” to transfer control of the IANA functions to a private entity. Please provide us with the Administration’s legal views and analysis on whether the United States Government can transition the IANA functions to another entity without an Act of Congress.
- Please explain why it is in our national interest to transition the IANA functions to the “global multistakeholder community.”
- You have stated that NTIA believes “the timing is right to start the transition process.” Why does the Administration believe now is the appropriate time to begin the transition, and what was the specific circumstance or development that led the Administration to decide to begin the transition now?
- What steps will NTIA take to ensure the process to develop a transition plan for the IANA functions is open and transparent?
- Will NTIA actively participate in the global multistakeholder process to develop a transition plan for the IANA functions, or will the Administration leave the process entirely in the hands of ICANN?
- You have stated that NTIA “will not accept a proposal that replaces NTIA’s role with a government-led or an inter-governmental solution,” but NTIA has been silent on how it will ensure the IANA functions do not end up being controlled, directly or indirectly, by a government or inter-governmental entity. What specific options are available to NTIA to prevent this from happening?
- How can the Administration guarantee the multistakeholder organization that succeeds NTIA will not subsequently transfer the IANA functions to a government or intergovernmental organization in the future, or that such successor organization will not eventually fall under the undue influence of other governments.
- NTIA asked ICANN to lead the transition process. However, ICANN has a potential self-interest in increasing its own autonomy and reducing its accountability to other entities. Some stakeholders have expressed concerns that ICANN may seek to control the IANA functions on its own, without oversight from anyone else. How did NTIA determine that ICANN is the appropriate entity to lead the transition process, and how will NTIA ensure that ICANN does not inappropriately control or influence the process for its own self-interest?
- Does NTIA believe ICANN currently is sufficiently transparent and accountable in its activities, or should ICANN adopt additional transparency and accountability requirements as part of the IANA transition?
- Is it realistic to expect that an acceptable transition plan can be developed before the IANA functions contract expires on September 30, 2015? Is there another example of a similar global stakeholder transition plan being developed and approved in just 18 months?
- How will NTIA ultimately decide whether a proposed transition plan for IANA, developed by global stakeholders, is acceptable? What factors will NTIA use to determine if such a proposal supports and enhances the multistakeholder model; maintains the security, stability, and resiliency of the Internet Domain Name System; meets the needs and expectation of the global customers and partners of the IANA services; and maintains the openness of the Internet?
- Will NTIA also take into account American values and interests in evaluating a proposed transition plan? How?
As this process moves forward, we will conduct careful oversight on behalf of the American people to ensure that American values, American interests, and the open Internet are protected. Your detailed responses to our questions and requests for information will aid in that oversight, and we thank you in advance for your personal attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
###
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Ranking Member on the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education and Related Agencies, met with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Marilyn Tavenner to discuss his ongoing concerns with the Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) program.
“I have heard from so many Kansas hospitals and health care providers who are frustrated with the flawed RAC program,” Sen. Moran said. “They have been forced to divert significant resources away from caring for patients to appeal incorrect audit decisions that are ultimately overturned. I’ve raised several concerns about this program in letters to HHS, at Appropriations Committee hearings and through language included in the FY2014 Omnibus Appropriations bill, so I was pleased to visit with Administrator Tavenner today. We need to achieve a balance of safeguarding Medicare finances while avoiding costly burdens on hospitals and health care providers that are affecting their ability to care for patients.”
CMS is the division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) responsible for administering Medicare and Medicaid. The RAC program focuses on post-payment reviews of Medicare claims from health care providers to prevent improper payments, but unfortunately flaws in the program are yielding incorrect audit results. This broken program is unreasonably burdening providers, and has created a two-year appeals backlog at HHS’ Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA). According to the HHS Inspector General, 56 percent of RAC appeals are reversed at OMHA, while several Kansas hospitals have appeal-win rates around 95 percent.
During the meeting, Administrator Tavenner and Sen. Moran discussed actions CMS is taking to improve the RAC program and the related backlog issues at OMHA. In particular, Administrator Tavenner said CMS will:
- Continue the current RAC moratorium on new reviews for 3-6 months to alleviate the current backlog;
- Withhold contingency fees from RACs until the second level of appeals levels are exhausted. This will allow health care providers continued use of the disputed funds to support ongoing business operations instead of having them frozen until cases are fully resolved;
- Establish a quality standard (90 percent accuracy rate) on appeals for RACs. If RACs do not meet this threshold, they will be subject to financial penalty;
- Require auditors to adjust their document requests based on the size of the provider and a provider’s denial of claims rate. Currently, RACs request documents from health care providers regardless of the resources available to the responding office or its track record of successful compliance with Medicare payment rules. This requirement will force RACs to limit their document requests based on the claim type and focus their efforts on bad actors;
- Allow a 30-day discussion period before claims are sent to Medicare Administrative Contractors for adjustment requiring auditors to acknowledge receipt within three days of such a request. Currently, RACs are required to stop further discussions upon notification of an appeal by the health care provider. This will allow providers an opportunity to fully discuss their claims with auditors before filing an appeal.
These initiatives are important initial steps toward improving the RAC program and alleviating the burden on health care providers. Additionally, HHS has established a working group to review the appeals process and offer recommendations to resolve the RAC and OMHA appeals backlog issues. Sen. Moran will follow-up on this issue at the FY2015 HHS hearing scheduled for May 7, 2014 with HHS Secretary Sebelius.
Sen. Moran and Administrator Tavenner also discussed Sen. Moran’s opposition to Obama Administration proposals that would cut reimbursements to Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) and eliminate hospitals from the CAH program. Additionally, they visited about CMS’ cuts to Medicare reimbursement for home health care services, which are threatening many Kansas seniors’ access home health care. Home health care is a cost-effective alternative to other forms of care – especially in rural areas where patients tend to be more geographically dispersed. Sen. Moran also expressed his objection to CMS’ unreasonable and inflexible physician supervision rules relating to the provision of outpatient therapeutic services. These regulations are making it difficult for many hospitals in Kansas and other rural states to provide these services to patients. In February, the Senate passed S. 1954, legislation Sen. Moran introduced to prevent the federal government from enforcing these burdensome supervision regulations for CAHs and other small, rural hospitals in 2014.
During his time in Congress, Sen. Moran has visited every community hospital in Kansas. The visits are extremely useful because they give him the opportunity to talk with Kansas health care providers and learn more about how they care for the residents of their communities.
Click here to read Sen. Moran’s Jan. 29, 2014 letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius stressing the importance of addressing the RAC program’s flaws.
Click here to read Sen. Moran’s Aug. 1, 2013, letter to HHS Secretary Sebelius asking for an update on HHS’ efforts to improve the RAC program.
###
Sen. Moran Statement on Ft. Hood Shooting
Apr 02 2014
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) released the following statement on the April 2, 2014, Ft. Hood shooting:
“Today’s shooting at Ft. Hood is a tragedy for the Killeen community, state of Texas, United States Armed Forces and the nation. I humbly ask all Kansans to join Robba and me in keeping victims and their families in our thoughts and prayers. As we wait for additional information on this terrible tragedy, we must reaffirm our commitment to protecting this country and its ideals from those who wish to do us harm.”
###
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Pat Roberts (R-Kan.) reacted to the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) announcement that they will commence a rulemaking process that could expand the number of pilots allowed to fly without obtaining a third-class medical certificate.
“Today’s announcement that the FAA is considering a commonsense rule change is good news for general aviation pilots in Kansas and across the country,” Sen. Moran said. “I encourage pilots to review this proposal and share feedback. I am hopeful an improved FAA rule will remove unnecessary hurdles for pilots trying to get off the ground, while preserving important safety standards in our nation’s skies.”
“I am pleased FAA has taken steps to review medical certification rules,” Sen. Roberts said. “I hope today’s action leads to a solution that will allow more pilots to fly recreationally and in a safe manner without having the burden of obtaining an unnecessary third-class medical requirement.”
Last month, Sens. Roberts and Moran, along with U.S. Senator John Boozman (R-Ark.), introduced the General Aviation Pilot Protection Act, S. 2103. The legislation would expand on the success of FAA’s 2004 Sport Pilot rule, which allows pilots to fly small, light aircraft without a third-class medical certificate, but requires them to undergo a biennial flight review by a certified flight instructor. During these flight reviews, instructors evaluate each pilot’s physical and cognitive condition, as well as his or her ability to safely operate an aircraft.
“For a decade, sport pilots have flown safely without third-class medical certificates, and we’re confident private pilots can do the same,” AOPA President Mark Baker said. “This issue is a top priority for AOPA members and we appreciate the FAA’s decision to move forward with rulemaking. We’re especially grateful to Reps. Rokita and Graves and Sens. Boozman, Roberts, and Moran for their leadership on medical certification reform. They understand the value of general aviation to the economy, the national transportation system, and the American way of life. And they recognize that expanding the third-class medical exemption will make it easier to get new pilots flying and keep experienced pilots safely in the air.”
S. 2103 is supported by the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA), Experimental Aircraft Association (EAA), General Aviation Manufacturers Association (GAMA) and the National Business Aviation Association (NBAA).
###
Sen. Moran Statement on 50th Anniversary of Senate Consideration of the Civil Rights Act
Apr 02 2014
WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) today released the following statement on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which came before the full Senate for debate this week 50 years ago:
“Fifty years ago, the Senate began consideration of what became the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The path to enactment proved difficult, overcoming nearly two months of deliberation before final passage. Yet with excellent leadership and bipartisan cooperation, this chamber achieved one of the most significant legislative accomplishments in our nation’s history.
“The quest for racial equality did not end with the Civil War, the Civil Rights Act or the election of our first African-American president. It is an ongoing project, in which we strive to fulfill the ideals that ‘all men are created equal’ in order to create a just society. We are a better nation because of the Civil Rights Act, and I am hopeful the days of passing historic legislation that improves the lives of all Americans are not in the Senate’s past.”
###
WASHINGTON, D.C. – Today, the first anniversary of the majority-rule adoption by the U.N. General Assembly of the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) again expressed frustration with the administration’s decision to sign U.N. ATT, their failure to respond to the bipartisan letter he led last fall, and their new efforts to implement the treaty without first obtaining the advice and consent of the Senate.
Sen. Moran leads the bipartisan opposition of at least 50 U.S. Senators to the U.N. ATT in the Senate. On numerous occasions, the group has expressed to President Obama that the Senate opposes ratification and will not be bound by its obligations including:
- In May 2012, Sen. Moran spoke on the U.S. Senate Floor about S. 2205, the Second Amendment Sovereignty Act, which he introduced to prohibit funding to negotiate a U.N. ATT that restricts the Second Amendment rights of U.S. citizens;
- In July 2012, Sen. Moran drafted a letter signed by 50 of his Senate colleagues and wrote an op-ed notifying the Administration that there was strong enough opposition to block the ATT from Senate passage;
- In March 2013, Sen. Moran introduced S. Con. Res. 7, a concurrent resolution sponsored by 35 of his Senate colleagues, which outlines specific criteria that must be met for U.N. ATT to be ratified by the U.S. Senate and recognized as customary international law. S. Con. Res. 7 has been endorsed by the National Rifle Association, Heritage Action, and the Endowment for Middle East Truth; and
- In October 2013, Sen. Moran led a bipartisan group of 50 U.S. Senators, including Senators Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) and Jim Inhofe (R-Okla.), in reiterating to President Obama that the Senate overwhelmingly opposes ratification and will not be bound by its obligations.
Click here to view the letter to the president, or find the full text below:
April 2, 2014
President Barack Obama
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20500
Dear President Obama:
On the first anniversary of the majority-rule adoption by the U.N. General Assembly of the United Nations’ Arms Trade Treaty, I write to express my continued concern and regret at your decision to sign the treaty, at your failure to respond to the bipartisan letter which I led last fall, and at your efforts to implement the treaty without first obtaining the advice and consent of the Senate.
On October 15, 2013, 50 members of the Senate delivered a letter to you pledging to oppose ratification of the treaty, and giving notice that we do not regard the U.S. as bound to uphold its object as purpose. In that letter, we set out six substantive concerns for this position, and invited your response.
Though Assistant Secretary of State Tom Countryman stated in November that the administration is “ready to discuss [the treaty] with people who don’t agree with us...and have offered to do so...repeatedly with very little response,” we have not received even the courtesy of an acknowledgement.
I must conclude from this fact that your administration is not interested in responding substantively to the concerns we have raised. Particularly in view of our constitutional responsibility for providing advice and consent on treaties, and of your proclaimed intention to rely on executive actions to achieve your policy objectives, I find this troubling.
Since October, both the Senate and the House of Representatives have made it clear that they oppose the implementation of the treaty until it passes through the full ratification process, including the passage of implementing legislation. The House sent a parallel letter in October, and, in December, you signed into law the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act, which contains a provision prohibiting the Department of Defense from expending any funding to implement the treaty prior to its full ratification.
The views of the Senate having been made clear, I was concerned when your administration announced a new conventional arms export control policy on January 15. While Assistant Secretary Countryman stated in November that “becoming a party to the treaty would not require any additional export or import controls for the United States, full stop,” the new policy, announced only two months later, bears a strong similarity to the criteria and standards in the treaty.
I therefore regard this new policy as an effort on the part of your administration to implement the treaty without obtaining the advice and consent of the Senate. I do not regard this policy as required by the treaty’s object and purpose: I view it as a voluntary effort to implement the treaty. I am disturbed both by the secrecy of the process that produced this new policy and the disregard it shows for the role of the Senate, in particular. I therefore call upon you to withdraw this policy and to consult fully with relevant committees and concerned offices as you revise it.
Finally, I note with regret the recent passing of Ambassador (retired) Donald A. Mahley, Special Negotiator on Nonproliferation, who served on the U.S. delegation to the U.N. that negotiated the Arms Trade Treaty. While we differ on the merits of the treaty, I am sure that you join us in expressing our condolences to his widow, Julianna Mahley, at the death of this tough-minded and plain-speaking servant of the nation in war and peace.
As in October, I urge you to notify the treaty depository that the U.S. does not intend to ratify the Arms Trade Treaty, and is therefore not bound by its obligations. I pledge to continue leading my colleagues in opposing the ratification of this treaty, and wish to repeat our previous notice that we do not regard the U.S. as bound to uphold its object and purpose. Lastly, I now urge you to end any and all efforts to implement the treaty before it passes completely through the entire U.S. ratification process, and thereby to show the respect for the constitutional processes that you are sworn to uphold.
I appreciate your consideration on this issue and look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Jerry Moran
U.S. Senator
Moran Introduces Bill Supporting Restoration of Tribal Homelands
Legislation Reaffirms Secretary of the Interior's Authority to Take Land into Trust for Tribes
Apr 01 2014
Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senators Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) and Jon Tester (D-Mont.) today introduced bipartisan legislation (S. 2188) to end the uncertainty and unnecessary litigation triggered by the U.S. Supreme Court’s Carcieri v. Salazar decision.
The Carcieri decision stems from a challenge by the Governor of Rhode Island to the Secretary of the Interior’s authority to take land into trust status for the Narragansett Indian Tribe under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 (IRA). In 2009, the Supreme Court held that the Secretary of the Interior did not have the authority to take land into trust for the tribe. This decision is creating delays in the processing of land-in-trust applications and in infrastructure and economic development projects across Indian Country, as well as numerous lawsuits.
“It is unjust for there to be two classes of Indians created by the Carcieri v. Salazar decision—those tribes federally recognized in 1934 and those recognized after,” said Senator Moran. “Tribes should no longer shoulder the burden of lawsuits and uncertainty that hinder their prosperity. The Secretary of Interior’s authority to take land into trust for all tribes is essential for economic development.”
“The Carcieri decision is crippling a key component of tribal sovereignty and economic viability while setting the stage for harmful court cases where only lawyers win,” Chairman Tester said. “We need to come together, work across party lines, and solve this problem. This is a difficult issue, but we cannot hold these sovereign nations hostage to a decision that creates two classes of tribes and stalls economic development across Indian Country.”
The legislation reaffirms the Secretary's authority to take land into trust for tribes, regardless of when they were recognized by the Federal government. The Carcieri decision said that the rights of tribes created before 1934 were secure, while those of tribes who were recognized after 1934 can be perpetually challenged.
President Brian Cladoosby, of the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) said, “NCAI is pleased that Senators Tester and Moran have introduced a bill to address the myriad problems created by the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Carcieri. The decision has caused significant uncertainty and confusion over legal jurisdiction, creating public safety problems and barriers to desperately needed economic development and job creation. The decision is a direct attack on tribal sovereignty and creates inequality among tribes. Because of the Carcieri decision tribes are also experiencing processing delays in trust land applications and seeing additional bureaucratic red tape for potential economic investors. NCAI looks forward to working with the Committee on correcting these wrongs and ensuring full protection of sovereignty for all tribes.”
###
Alvin Brensing Tribute
Apr 01 2014
The story of Kansas is one that involves many people, many jobs, much ado about caring for others. Our state is a state of manufacturing workers, factory workers, teachers, people who work hard — farmers — every day to make a difference in their community and to make a difference in our state and nation. Today, I want to pay tribute to one of those unsung heroes. In this case, it’s a businessman, a volunteer, a husband, a father, who lived a full life before passing away in December of last year.
Alvin Brensing was born and raised on a farm outside of Hudson, a rural central Kansas town with a population of 125. And after high school, Brensing graduated with honors from Salt City Business College in Hutchinson and in May 1937, at the age of 21, started working as a bookkeeper at the Stafford County Flour Mills.
As German immigrants, the Krug family realized that their American Dream was going to be accomplished by establishing the flour mill more than a century before. Alvin worked under William Krug and then Leonard Brim to help grow the company before being named its president in 1986. Under his leadership, Stafford County Flour Mills doubled its capacity and grew two and a half times its size. It is one of the last independent flour mills remaining in the United States, and the mill produces Hudson Cream Flour. Many of my colleagues and Americans will have seen the bag of flour with the great symbol and emblem — Hudson Cream Flour. And that Hudson Cream Flour has a reputation around the nation as a top-notch baking flour for its consistency and texture. It also serves as a tradition for this West Virginia family who wrote the company saying this:
After using Hudson Cream Flour for all the years I have cooked . . . I can remember even my grandmother and mother using nothing else . . . I read for the first time the “absolute satisfaction guarantee” and really had a good laugh! I thought, if those people in Kansas only knew the absolute satisfaction my family has enjoyed from their product. The things we pass down in our family are good morals, good cooking, and Hudson Cream flour!
After his wife died in 1993, he came to miss the smell of fresh bread and soon began experimenting with the ingredients himself. Alvin came up with three recipes, including “Al's Cinnamon Raisin Bread,” which is included on the back of every Hudson Cream Flour bag.
Alvin always put farmers and customers first. The current Stafford County Flour Mills president Reuel Foote reflected that Alvin often said, “Our word is our bond — if you agree to do something, you do it.”
While Alvin dedicated most of his life to ensuring the success and future of the mill, he was also a tireless volunteer in the Hudson community. Brensing took upon himself to maintain the Hudson Trinity Cemetery, where his parents and wife, Zelda, are buried. In fact, he upgraded a shed on the property into a building where loved ones can now comfortably look up the location of their loved ones’ graves.
Alvin was also known as the local weatherman, collecting data for the National Weather Service from a local grain elevator. And his daughters remember their dad turning the furnace on each Sunday morning to heat up the Trinity Community Church.
His legacy of leadership and volunteerism is what will live on as the Stafford County Flour Mills continue to support the community and educate youth, whether it’s through the county 4-H Program or through the dozens of mill tours given each year. The mill also continues Alvin’s tradition of giving each school kid a five-pound bag of flour after each tour to encourage them to experiment with recipes and baking.
Alvin taught through his actions that satisfaction in life comes from what you do for others rather than what you do for yourself. This is the legacy that I want to pay tribute to today, and this is the legacy that he lived and leaves behind for the future generation.
We want those who follow him and us to know that they have their chance to return home, put down their roots, and raise their own families in places like Hudson, Kansas. Our Nation faces so many challenges today, but we must remain committed to doing what it takes so that tomorrow and every day thereafter our children and grandchildren have the opportunity to enjoy that special way of life in places like Kansas and to pursue their own American Dream.
Madam President, I ask my colleagues to join me in paying tribute and remembering the life of a great Kansan, Alvin Brensing.