Medical Research News

There are no records to display that match the provided criteria.

Sen. Moran Votes to Repeal Burdensome 1099 Mandate on Businesses

Now headed to President Obama's desk for signature

Apr 05 2011

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) today voted in favor of H.R. 4, the House-passed bill to repeal the costly and unprecedented 1099 tax reporting mandate in the new health care law. The Senate passed the measure by a vote of 87 to 12, and H.R. 4 will now be sent to President Obama’s desk. When the president signs the bill into law, it will mark the first significant change to the health care law – a change supported by both sides of the aisle.

“Today’s repeal of the 1099 requirement is good news for small businesses and agriculture producers, who would bear the largest burden under this onerous provision,” Sen. Moran said. “The new requirement would have increased 1099 filings by 2000 percent and buried businesses in paperwork, substantially increasing the cost of doing business in an already challenging economic environment.

“This is the first of hopefully many commonsense reforms to the damaging health care law,” Sen. Moran continued. “I will continue to work to ensure the law is replaced with provisions that improve our current health care system, reduce costs, and keep personal health care decisions between patients and their doctors.”

Sen. Moran voted in favor of a Senate-originated amendment to repeal the 1099 provision in February. He also joined U.S. Senator Mike Johanns (R-Neb.) in sponsoring two pieces of legislation to repeal the provision.

According to the National Taxpayer Advocate, a division of the IRS, the 1099 provision of the health care law would impact as many as 40 million American businesses. Of that number, 26 million businesses are sole proprietorships, not counting farms. The Small Business Association estimates that small businesses have created more than 64 percent of new jobs nationally over the past 15 years. At a time when Washington is urging businesses to hire workers, the new 1099 requirement is a government-imposed obstacle to economic growth and job creation.

# # #

Sen. Moran Sponsors 3-D Energy Bill

Would increase domestic production, grow domestic jobs and decrease our national debt

Apr 01 2011

Senator Jerry Moran joined Sen. David Vitter in introducing the 3-D Act: The Domestic Jobs, Domestic Energy, and Deficit Reduction Act of 2011.

Sen. Moran: America is Not Immune to Laws of Economics

Will vote 'no' absent serious plan to reduce deficit

Mar 31 2011

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) spoke this week on the floor of the U.S. Senate to voice his concern over raising the debt ceiling. Congress will soon vote on whether to raise the debt limit for the 11th time in the last decade.

Please find excerpts from his floor statement below:

“Delaying difficult decisions and simply increasing the debt ceiling once again should not be an option. The time to correct our failures is now. This debate has serious consequences today and into the future. If we fail to act as we should, we will reduce the opportunities for the next generation of Americans to pursue the American dream.

“This is the most expected economic crisis – we know what will happen if we do not act. It would be immoral to just look the other way. We are not immune to the laws of economics that face every country.

“To date, President Obama has provided little or no leadership on what I believe to be the most important issue facing our nation: our national debt. I recently informed the President that with no indication his willingness to lead will change, I will vote ‘no’ on his request to raise the debt ceiling. I do that because I believe that in the absence of serious and significant spending reductions, reform in the budget process, and a constitutional amendment that restricts the ability to spend money we do not have – our country’s future is in grave danger.”

Click here to view a video of Senator Moran’s comments.

###

Sen. Moran: Spending Beyond Our Means is No Longer an Option

Republican Constitutional amendment will require a balanced budget

Mar 31 2011

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), a member of the Senate Committee on Appropriations, released the following statement regarding the Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution unveiled today by Senate Republicans:

“In the coming weeks the United States will reach its $14.29 trillion borrowing limit. This is the eleventh time in the last decade Congress will have to vote on whether to allow our country to take on more debt. Spending beyond our means is no longer an option. The best way to get our spending under control is to pass a budget and stick to it. By forcing Congress to be disciplined and live within a budget, we will turn away from record deficits and back to fiscal responsibility.”

The Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution – co-sponsored by every Senate Republican – would require the president to submit and Congress to pass a balanced budget each year, cap federal spending at 18 percent of gross domestic product (below the 25.3 percent proposed in President Obama’s 2012 budget), and require a two-thirds vote of the House and Senate to raise taxes.

The proposal relies heavily on constitutional amendments introduced earlier this year, including an amendment co-sponsored by Sen. Moran.

Click here to view a fact sheet on the Consensus Balanced Budget Amendment.

# # #

Sens. Moran, Roberts Stabenow and Kloubuchar Introduce Bipartisan Bill to Boost Ag Industry

Legislation sets five-year depreciation schedule for farming equipment

Mar 31 2011

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) joined U.S. Senators Pat Roberts (R-Kan.), Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) today to introduce bipartisan legislation that would amend the U.S. tax code to permanently set a five-year depreciation schedule for agricultural equipment. The current tax code sets a seven-year depreciation schedule for agricultural equipment, while the depreciation schedule for construction equipment – which is similar in use and life span to farming equipment – is five years. Changing the depreciation schedule for agricultural equipment to five years would make the tax code more consistent and aid rural development by aligning depreciation and debt service, increasing farm income by over $850 million a year, and helping farmers and ranchers finance new equipment and replace worn-out machinery.

“Common sense dictates that depreciation schedules should match the typical length of debt service for farm machinery,” Sen. Moran said. “By reforming the tax code, we will better align the code with the realities of agribusiness and support our nation’s farmers and ranchers, who are critical to the success of our economy.”

“Providing certainty in the tax code by making agriculture equipment eligible for a five-year depreciation schedule makes sense and will go a long way in helping America’s farmers and ranchers invest in their businesses and communities,” Sen. Roberts said.

“This bipartisan effort will strengthen American manufacturing and American agriculture,” Chairwoman Stabenow said. “As Chairwoman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, I’m committed to streamlining and simplifying our nation’s farm policies and finding ways to make existing programs work better. This legislation will encourage farmers and agricultural producers to continue investing in their businesses, creating jobs and strengthening the economy.”

“Putting money back in the pockets of our farmers and ranchers enables them to grow our agricultural economy and strengthen our rural communities,” Sen. Klobuchar said. “By bringing tax fairness to our farms and ranches, our agricultural producers can purchase the modern equipment that will allow them to produce more while spending less.”

A five-year depreciation schedule would boost domestic demand for equipment. The United States is the world leader in the production of agricultural equipment, with the industry directly and indirectly employing 250,000 workers.

Modern equipment is fitted with the latest safety features to help prevent injury and loss of life, as well as technology that employs emission controls that help reduce air pollution and fertilizer runoff.

Sen. Moran serves on the Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies. Sens. Stabenow and Roberts are the chair and ranking member, respectively, of the Senate Agriculture Committee, and Sen. Klobuchar also serves on the committee. 

###

 

Madam President, I thank the Senator from Illinois for accommodating my ability to speak on the Senate floor this afternoon on what I consider also to be a very significant and important topic.

Our country is facing significant financial difficulties and in the coming weeks, the United States will reach its $14.29 trillion limit for borrowing. Unfortunately, this is the 11th time in the past decade that Congress will vote on whether to allow the country to take on even more debt. These financial challenges that we face, if left unchecked, will have a disastrous impact upon our country today and upon our citizens in the future.

For way too long members of both political parties have ignored this growing fiscal crisis and have allowed our country to live well, well beyond its means. Delaying difficult decisions and simply increasing the debt ceiling once again should not be an option. The time to correct our failures is now.

Officials from the Obama administration warn that the failure of Congress to raise the legal debt limit would risk default. But the bigger economic threat that confronts our country are the consequences of allowing our country's pattern of spending and borrowing to continue without a serious plan to reduce that debt. Our out-of-control debt is slowing our economic growth and threatening the prosperity for future generations who will have to pay for our irresponsibility.

In the next three decades our debt very well would grow to more than three times the size of our entire economy. This level of government spending is unsustainable and cannot continue. Our Congress is engaged in a serious and significant debate now about a continuing resolution. What that resolution is, the result of the failure of the past Congress to pass a budget and to pass appropriations bills to fill in the blanks of that budget. In fact, we are now dealing with the next 6 months of spending, the end of the fiscal year which ends September 30 of this year. And we are having an argument about the magnitude of the reductions of spending to include in the final 6 months of this continuing resolution.

I certainly admit and wish to participate in the debate. I admit it is an important issue, but I think that there is more significant issues yet to come. While it is important how we resolve the next 6 months, it is even more important that we adopt a budget for the next fiscal year, fiscal year 2012; that we return to regular order and have an appropriations process in which we can determine levels of spending within that budget, establish our priorities, eliminate programs, decrease spending where appropriate, and move this country to a balanced budget.

In addition to this CR that we are debating about for the next 6 months and to next year's budget and appropriations process, there is looming the more serious consequences of so-called mandatory spending which comprises 56 percent of our entire budget. We have got to get beyond the CR debate of today and get to the spending problems of 2012 and beyond and to the issue of so-called mandatory spending that consume our budget and drives up, now and in the future, our debt.

We need to be responsible and quickly resolve the spending bill for this year and move on to these issues that will determine the future of our country, especially the economic future for the citizens of our nation today and into the future.

I think the President ought to consider in his budget--but he didn't--the recommendations of his National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. And we have seen, once again, the failure of the budget as proposed by this President to include any of those provisions that his own commission recommended in getting us out of the financial difficulty that we are in.

It seems to me that often, at least throughout my lifetime, we have heard the discussion here in Washington, DC--I, as an American citizen, as an observer of the politics and the policies of our Nation's capital, have heard year in and year out about the need to reduce spending, to balance the books, to quit spending so much money, to be more fiscally responsible. Our fiscal house has to be put in order. Those are words I have heard throughout my entire adult life, and yet I am fearful they have once again just become words.

We do not have the luxury of those words meaning nothing this time around. I would suggest that there are those who may observe the proceedings of this Congress this year and say: Once again, there is a political debate going on. It is rhetoric between Republicans and Democrats. It is a battle between the House and the Senate, between the Congress and the President, without recognizing that this debate has serious consequences to the American people today and into the future.

As I said earlier, spending beyond our means is no longer an option, and the failure of us to address these issues in a responsible manner means that the standard of living American citizens enjoy today will be diminished. It means a lower standard of living for every American family. It means the increase in interest rates. It means the return of inflation. It means the increase in our imbalance of payments. It means that our trade balance is exacerbated. It means that we may follow the path of other countries in the world today that have failed to address these issues, and we will see the circumstances that many countries find themselves in, in which their credit ratings have diminished and their interest rates have risen.

If we fail to respond, if we fail to act as we should, if we let one more time this issue to pass for somebody else to solve because it is so difficult, we will reduce the opportunities that the next generation of Americans have to pursue the American dream.

This is not an academic or a political party discussion. It is not a philosophical debate. It has true economic consequences to every American. We are not immune from the laws of economics that face every country, and in the failure to get our financial house in order and borrowing under control, interest rates will rise, our creditors may decide we are no longer creditworthy, and we will suffer the same consequences that countries in our world today are suffering who followed this path.

This is the most expected economic crisis in our lifetime, perhaps in the history of our country. We know what is going to happen if we don’t act, and we would be acting so immorally and without responsibility should just we look the other way because the politics of this issue are too difficult.

Americans deserve, are entitled to leadership in Washington, DC, to confront these problems and not to push them off to the next generation of Americans, and I am sorry to say that, in my view, to date the President has provided little leadership on what I consider to be this most important issue of my generation.

My interest in public service and politics is one that has lots of beginnings, but the thing that has me committed to public service today is a belief that I and people in my generation--in fact, every American citizen--has the responsibility to pass on to the next generation of Americans the ability to pursue the American dream. Our failure to act today, our failure--to simply raise the debt ceiling one more time--means we will have abdicated our responsibilities and the burdens will fall to those who follow us. We will have lacked the morality and the courage necessary to do right.

Earlier this week, I informed the President, in correspondence to President Obama on March 22, with these words: 

Americans are looking for leadership in Washington to confront the problems of today, not push them off on future generations. To date, [Mr. President,] you have provided little or no leadership on what I believe to be the most important issue facing our nation--our national debt. With no indication that your willingness to lead will change, I [write] to inform you [, Mr. President,] I will vote “no” on your request to raise the debt ceiling.

I do that because I believe in the absence of serious and significant spending reductions, in the absence of serious and significant reform in the budget and spending process, in the absence of a constitutional amendment that restricts our ability to spend money we do not have, in the absence of statutory guidelines that tell us we cannot spend and borrow ad infinitum, that our country's future is in grave danger. I do this with a sense of responsibility to Americans today and a sense of responsibility for Americans to come. 

I ask the President to provide that leadership, to address the issues of not only this continuing resolution and next year's spending level and the so-called mandatory spending, but also to help us create an economy in which growth can occur, in which business men and women make decisions to employ new workers, and that the American people have the opportunity, when they sit around the dining room table and discuss their future, they know they have the chance to keep the job they have or to find a job they do not have.

That will require the leadership of President Obama and Republicans and Democrats in the House and Senate. In the absence of any indication that leadership is going to be provided, and that we are going to be serious in addressing our problems of today, and resolving them for the future, I will vote “no” on extending the debt limit.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), a member of the Senate Banking Committee, made the following statement today after the release of the proposed rule to implement Section 941 of the Dodd-Frank Act: 

“The definition of what is a ‘qualified residential mortgage’ will have a lasting impact on the ability of Kansans to access affordable credit,” Sen. Moran said. “The agencies involved must take particular care in evaluating the public comments received on these proposed rules to ensure lines are drawn appropriately and credit is not unnecessarily restricted just as the housing market begins to find its footing.”

WASHINGTON, DC – U.S. Senator Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) released the following statement regarding Google’s announcement today that they signed a development agreement to build their first ultra high-speed network in Kansas City, Kansas:

“Today’s announcement from Google is great news for Kansas. Increased Internet speeds will encourage business development, enhance the delivery of health care, and improve the ability of Kansas teachers to educate students,” Sen. Moran said. “Google’s fiber project will also create high-quality jobs, attract new talent to our state and improve the quality of life for Kansans.

“The future of Internet-based applications is limitless, and I am excited about Google’s decision to make Kansas home to a new fiber project,” Sen. Moran continued. “Congratulations to Kansas City for a successful application and to Google for selecting a worthy partner.”

Nearly 1,100 cities applied for Google’s “Fiber for Communities” project, which aims to provide a community with Internet access more than 100 times faster than what most Americans have today. In selecting a city, Google’s goal was to find locations where they could build efficiently, make an impact on the community and develop relationships with local government and community organizations. Pending approval from Kansas City’s Board of Commissioners, Google plans to offer service beginning in 2012.

 

###